
Florida’s enforcement action against Roku marks the first test of the Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) and could reshape how streaming platforms, smart TVs, and other voice-enabled devices handle sensitive data. With growing regulatory attention to child-directed content and data monetization, organizations must be prepared for scrutiny under evolving state privacy laws.
On October 14, 2025, the Florida Attorney General filed a lawsuit against Roku, Inc. and its subsidiary, alleging the unlawful collection and sale of children’s personal data, including geolocation, voice recordings, and TV viewing habits. The lawsuit claims Roku failed to comply with requirements under Florida’s Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), including obligations around age verification, disclosure of data sales, and limits on re-identification of de-identified information.
The AG’s complaint centers on the platform’s child-oriented features, including a “Kids & Family” category, children’s screensavers, and third-party apps, asserting that these elements should have triggered proactive age verification and privacy safeguards. Florida alleges that Roku knowingly profited from the use and sale of sensitive children’s data without proper consent or transparency.
Though the FDBR applies to a limited class of entities—those with over $1 billion in annual global revenue and offering smart speakers, voice assistants, or digital advertising—the case sets a precedent that could influence regulatory strategies in other states and prompt broader compliance reviews across industries with voice-enabled or child-directed content.
Expert Analysis
Florida’s enforcement action against Roku under the new Digital Bill of Rights makes one thing clear: states are ready to crack down on how companies collect, share, and reidentify consumer, especially children’s, data. It’s the first case under Florida’s law and sets a precedent for how regulators will expect companies to prove compliance in real time.
To stay ahead, organizations need a centralized, multichannel consent and age-assurance system that acts as a single source of truth; automated updates that push consent and opt-out signals to every downstream platform and data partner; and audit-ready logs that show exactly when and how those signals were honored. Without this level of coordination, it’s nearly impossible to stop unlawful data use or to prove you did the right thing when regulators come calling.
Fahad Diwan, JD, FIP, CIPP/M, CIPP/C, Director of Product, Privacy, Exterro
Establish a centralized consent management system that tracks user permissions at a granular level—by data type, purpose, and audience. This ensures compliance with diverse state laws and provides clear audit trails in case of regulatory inquiries. Learn the basics of deploying an enterprise-level consent solution in this quick guide.