
In the world of e-discovery, management guru Peter Drucker’s maxim holds more weight than ever: "If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it." For legal professionals, treating e-discovery as a business process—complete with tracking and optimizing metrics—is the only way to ensure repeatability, defensibility, and cost-efficiency.
Since document review typically accounts for 73% of e-discovery budgets, reducing these costs is the most direct path to controlling legal spend. Here is a breakdown of the foundational metrics you should track to master your project timelines and budgets.
Before kicking off a review, you must understand the data "funnel." Tracking these three data points across multiple projects allows you to create highly accurate rules of thumb for future litigation.
Once you have your refined document count (after deduplication and culling), you can use this simple calculation to project your costs and resource needs:
$$\frac{\text{Total Documents}}{\text{Review Rate (Docs/Hour)}} \times \text{Hourly Rate} = \text{Estimated Project Cost}$$
By running these numbers early, legal leaders can determine if the cost of discovery is disproportionate to the value of the case. If the projected review cost exceeds the potential settlement or judgment, it may be time to seek a settlement for purely economic reasons rather than continuing a high-cost discovery battle.
For a deeper dive into optimizing your review process, you can download the full whitepaper: 14 Pivotal Metrics for Reducing Document Review Costs.