
The COVID-19 pandemic has gripped the world to extremes never seen before, and there are a number of key cybersecurity lessons that have been learned from it. First, the notion of a 99% remote workforce was a concept that many thought would take years to come to fruition; instead, it happened in just three short months.
The gravity of Identity Access Management (IAM) has now come front and center, as businesses realize just how vulnerable their confidential information truly is. This is where the Zero Trust Framework becomes a critical focal point.
In traditional IAM models, there is often an implicit level of trust. For example, long-tenured employees might bypass certain authentication mechanisms without being questioned.
The Zero Trust Framework takes this to the opposite extreme: nobody is trusted, whether they are internal or external to the company. This applies to end-users, devices, and even high-ranking members of the C-Suite and Board of Directors. To gain access, every entity must be fully vetted and authenticated to the maximum level possible.
[Image showing Zero Trust micro-segmentation, with individual security perimeters around every user, device, and application]
(SOURCE: 1)
Other essential tools to enforce the Zero Trust Framework include:
Deploying Zero Trust is not a "one fell swoop" event; it is a phased-in approach. Keep these four key areas in mind:
As you consider adding the infrastructure to support Zero Trust, you should also look for technology to assist with HR investigations and post-breach analysis. The AccessData API integrates seamlessly with your cybersecurity platform to kick off investigations the moment an intrusion is detected.
With our latest release, AD Enterprise is the first forensic solution to offer in-network collection, superior Mac collection, off-network collection, and cloud data source collection—all in one product!
In a future blog, we will examine the key advantages and disadvantages of a Zero Trust Framework.
SourcesTechTarget: Zero Trust Model Definition