The Simplified
E-⁠Discovery Case Law Library
A collection of simple, easy to understand analyses and resources on e-⁠discovery case law.
Case shelved under Recent Case Law

Data Retention Policies Save Spoliating Party

Mafile v. Kaiser-Francis Oil
N.D. Okla. May 21, 2019
Why This Case Is Important

Employees come and go. It’s the legal department’s obligation that necessary steps are taken to preserve data from recently departed employees or risk spoliation if a departing employee is involved in pending litigation.


In this employment case, the plaintiff motioned for spoliation sanctions against her former employer, the defendant, for not preserving the plaintiff’s work computer.

After being fired by the defendant, the plaintiff’s counsel sent a notice reminding the defendant of their obligation to preserve data. Nevertheless, via deposition, the defendant’s IT supervisor said that the plaintiff’s computer was given to a charitable organization just 4 days after receiving the notice to preserve.

Based on the destruction of the plaintiff’s work computer, plaintiff contends that a “treasure trove” of relevant information was willfully and intentionally destroyed.

  • Court Rejects Spoliation Motion. Based on the plaintiff failing to show prejudice felt by the destruction of the computer, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for spoliation sanctions.
  • Defendant Should Have Preserved the Computer. The court notes that the defendant should have preserved the computer and was 100% at fault for failing to do so.
  • Duplicative Data Available. Based on the defendant’s document retention policy, all the plaintiff’s data from her computer was uploaded onto their server. Additionally plaintiff never proved that data was missing that couldn’t be retrieved from the server.
Download case law PDF

Download the PDF version of Mafille v. Kaiser-Francis Oil case law alert here.

Legal Analysis
On Mafile v. Kaiser-Francis Oil
Andrew Peck, Sr. Counsel, DLA Piper
Andrew Peck, Sr. Counsel, DLA Piper

Company’s must preserve the computers (or contents) of departing employees who have sued, or are anticipated to sue, the company. It remains, however, for the plaintiff to show prejudice from the loss of the data. Moreover, courts don’t like “tenuous” sanctions motions that detract from a merits based resolution of the case.

Judge Peck's Bio
return to case law library
Recent Case Law room