The Simplified
E-Discovery Case Law Library
A collection of simple, easy to understand analyses and resources on e-discovery case law.
Proportionality
Under FRCP 26, defining the scope of discovery isn’t just about determining relevancy, but also determining what is proportional. Read to learn what is considered "proportional" e-discovery parameters by the courts.
Recommended reading
Most Recent Proportionality Cases
PGA Tour Wins E-Discovery Court Order
case entry
Mickelson et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
N.D. Cal. Nov 17, 2022
Boilerplate Objections Are Insufficient—But Not Enough to Be Waived
case entry
Doma Title Insurance, Inc. v. Avance Title, LLC
D. Md. Jul 11, 2022
Work-Related Messages on Employee Cell Phones Outside of Firm’s Duty to Collect
case entry
In Re Pork Antitrust Litigation
D. Minn. Mar 31, 2022
Most Popular
1
Discovery Negligence Can Result in Both Punitive and Compensatory Damages
ORP Surgical, LLP v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
D. Colo. May 10, 2022
2
Failure to Proactively Preserve Data Leads to Sanctions
Europe v. Equinox Holdings, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. Mar 21, 2022
3
Use of Ephemeral Messaging Leads to Adverse Inference Sanction
F.T.C v. Noland
D. Ariz. Aug 30, 2021
exterro resources
Resources related to proportionality in e-discovery
E-Book
E-Discovery Survival Guide: Best Practices for Finding Responsive Data
White Paper
Reducing E-Discovery Costs Without Sacrificing Defensibility
