This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.

BREAKING NEWS! Florida State Courts Enact E-Discovery Specific Rules

Created on July 6, 2012


Demand Generation & Partner Marketing Manager

What has become a common trend of late, Florida has joined 30 other states in adopting rules that specifically address e-discovery issues. Starting in September, Florida's new e-discovery rules will go into effect within its state courts. Home to 16 Fortune 500 corporations and 93,000 lawyers, Florida has revamped its rules of civil procedure to standardize guidelines to make e-discovery less costly and promote greater e-discovery education among judges and attorneys.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) has served as a template for states wishing to incorporate their own e-discovery amendments. Florida on the other hand, while taking bits and pieces from the FRCP, diverged from the federal rules in several key areas. Below are some of the key provisions in the amended Florida rules of civil procedure (to read the amendments in its entirety, click here).

  • Discovery includes Electronically Stored Information (ESI): Expressly authorizes discovery of ESI
  • Meet & Confer Optional: Unlike under the FRCP, which require that meet and confers take place under all circumstances, the Florida rules specify that only within complex litigation do the rules “require the parties in a complex civil case to address the possibility of an agreement between them addressing the extent to which electronic information should be preserved."
  • Proportionality: Similar to the FRCP, parties may object to discovery requests, but the moving party must prove “the information sought or the format requested is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost." Courts also have the right to shift costs between parties.
  • E-Discovery Sanctions: Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information that was lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.

Florida e-discovery attorney Ralph Losey recently spoke with the E-Discovery Beat and addressed the rule changing process. Listen to the full recorded interview here.

Mike Hamilton, J.D. is a Sr. E-Discovery Analyst at Exterro, Inc., focusing on educating Exterro customers, prospects and industry experts on how to solve e-discovery issues proactively with technology. His e-discovery knowledge, legal acumen and practical experience give him a valuable perspective on bridging the gap between IT and legal teams. You can find him on Google+, Twitter and Linkedin.

Comments

~ Select Clients ~

Allstate
Statoil
AOL
JP Morgan Chase
Nike
Citgo
Target
United Health
Microsoft
Metlife
Marathon
Starbucks
AstraZeneca
Visa
Oracle
DOJ
Kroger
American Express
Lockheed Martin
Allergan
New York Life
Intel
Golden Living
Hanover Insurance
Consolidated Edison Company (Con-Ed)
Supervalu
Los Alamos National Lab
Washingon AGO
Juniper Networks
Boeing
Corvel
Trinity
American Airlines
Lifepoint Hospitals
Fidelity
Columbia Pipeline Group
Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA)
State Compensation Insurance Fund
The AES Corporation
Stryker Corporation
South Carolina Ports Authority